top of page

areas of expertise

My working profile highlights my mixed experiences in the corporate and public sectors. I take pride in my mixed background as it gave me the knowledge on how best practices can be shared between both worlds. In the last four years, my job was to learn how to translate my knowledge into practical information for my clients in both sectors. Instead of talking about Talent management, I started working with Learning and Development. Likewise, instead of Employee relations, I started working with Community engagement. Lastly, instead of Corporate Governance and External Affairs, I started working with Structure Design and Partnerships. 

​

The language that seeks to differentiate the expertise in corporate and nonprofit sectors is often confusing. I am a strong believer that knowledge should have no label when it comes to organisations and people management. I am a witness of the many similarities between organisations of the same sector and across sectors. Organisations can learn from each other to improve processes, programs, hierarchy and governance. 

Traditional politicians are struggling to build up appealing campaigns and compete with the rise of charismatic populist rivals and youthful grassroots faces. From the modern politician, constituents are looking for a relatable image and not ivory tower experts that tell them what to do. Politicians nowadays are expected to quickly react to any political happening on social media.

 

Moreover, politicians are expected to keep up a high level of engagement with their communities, not only to inform but also to gather ideas. Political communication campaigns are no longer one way routed, they need to be designed to invite supporters to engage in debate and feel one with the politician. 

Community Engagement and Political Communications

The term organisational development is often used in the corporate sector. Many times it is easy to reject this foreign concept from the point of view of political parties or non-governmental organisations. Yet every organisation needs a structure and processes to support the accomplishment of their goals. Recently, we see how more and more civic movements decided to take a step forward and become an organisation. We can also see how more civic actors decide to enter the political arena. Nevertheless, we see the common mistake of imitating existing structures of old political parties or old traditional NGOs. 

 

The reality is that traditional structures and processes do not work for every organisation. Only a few organisations are lucky enough to survive organisational imitation and align their values to it. Organisations and processes need to reflect the values and mission of the people working in them. To create a good organisational development framework, each political organisation should think first of their values and then map how those can be translated into processes and hierarchies that satisfy all members. New political organisations need tailored solutions, but must also be aware of best practices to develop their staff, who are often made of graduates or volunteers. Best practices can enable tailored frameworks to better use staff, data and resources. Thus accepting some external processes and structures, while remaining focused on tailored solutions, align with the organisation’s values. 

Civic and Political organisational development

The concepts of leadership and representation are being challenged day by day. A leader for the public good is not expected to be only a visionary. They are expected to be a relatable figure that represents their constituency and hears their concerns. Many times political and civic leaders are visionaries with limited work experience outside public work. The high level of scrutiny and pressure cannot be overcome only with a charismatic facade. Leadership requires individuals to reflect on their mission to represent and to take personal time to review that the natural ego is not overtaking the public good roles entrusted to the leader. 

 

Leadership development implies personal development. This means the development of several skills that allow individuals to complement their vision with empathy and professionalism. Political leadership development is often only focused on learning communication skills. Only a few political and civic leaders are prepared to face the stress of being targeted by the media, being the subject of constant public scrutiny and being unable to motivate the staff and inner managers of their organisations.   

Civic and Political leadership development

bottom of page